Ref. BWM Lange 002
Aylesford UVAS®
Paper accounts for around 20% of UK waste. It is therefore
vitally important that industry leaders such as Aylesford Newsprint are
committed to Environmental performance.
Furthermore, the Mill employs 400 people in its Mill situated close to a
pretty section of Kent’s River Medway.
Aylesford Newsprint, who broke a world record for Newsprint
production in December 2000, manufactures 100% recycled newsprint at its state
of the art mill in Kent. Sold under the Renaissance brand name, its products
continue to be the natural choice for buyers of premium quality newsprint, used
by Europe’s leading newspaper publishers. The mill recycles about half a
million tonnes of recovered newspapers and magazines per annum to produce some
400,000 tonnes of recycled premium grade newsprint. CEO Alan McKendrick lists Aylesford’s environmental performance
as a key factor in making the business a
success.
The company ethos is one of continuous process improvement
to achieve the highest possible operational and environmental standards.
Aylesford is accredited to ISO 14001 for its environmental management, and is
regulated by the Environment Agency under the new Integrated Pollution
Prevention and Control (IPPC) regulations.
Aylesford Newsprint’s water treatment plant deals with approx. 16,500 m3/day of
process water mainly from the fibre preparation plant. Effluent from the paper
mill is first filtered (primary treatment) and then cooled before entering the
activated sludge plant before clarification and discharge to the River Medway.
Primary Treatment
An aqueous
solution of cationic polyacrylamide is injected prior to three parallel
rotating drum filters to agglomerate the suspended solids and assist drainage.
The number of filters in service depends on the current demand. The separated
suspended solids are discharged via a chute into the mixed sludge sump. The
filtered water is deposited in the primary treated water (PTE) sump. The
temperature of the PTE can be as high as 45 Deg C when the mill operation is
stable. This temperature could inhibit secondary activity and cause the consent
limit on final water temperature to be threatened. Therefore the PTE is cooled
to about 27 Deg C in a ‘single pass open evaporative cooling tower’ consisting
of two cells with variable speed fans. Each cell is designed to remove about
12.5MW of thermal energy and one cell is usually sufficient to achieve the
cooling duty.
Secondary Treatment
The plant
consists of up to seven aeration tanks. Oxygen is obtained from either a liquid
storage vessel or an on site oxygen generator. Two clarifiers are used for
separation of the activated sludge from the cleaned effluent, which is then
discharged to the Medway River. The retention time in the aeration section of
the plant is about 10 hours (depending on hydraulic throughput). The selectors
can be run anoxic or aerobic, which means that there are areas of "fast
uptake" (or adherence to the sludge). Under normal operating conditions
the aerobic plant removes approximately 85% of the incoming COD and 98% of the
BOD, giving BOD figures of less than 10mg/l and CODs of about 250mg/l. These
values are considered normal for a de-inking mill producing newsprint. The
suspended solid level is generally about 15mg/l.
Tertiary Treatment
There are no
water recycling tertiary treatment stages but there is a drum filter available
to treat solids carryover from the clarifiers if required. This is normally
bypassed. Solids separated in this process are transferred into the mixed
sludge sump. The hard COD remaining in the final effluent is typically 90%
lignin with the remainder being extractives, consisting of chemicals such as waxes,
resins and oils, normally from adhesives attached to the recovered paper.
Aylesford Newsprint Typical Discharge Performance
|
|
Actual |
Consent Limit |
|
Volume m3/day |
14,500 |
22,000 |
Suspended solids mg/l |
<20 |
60 |
|
BOD mg/l |
<10 |
40 |
There
are a number of factors affecting the choice of instrumentation for monitoring
of discharges.
Monitoring
may be necessary for operational reasons, or it may be necessary for compliance
purposes.
Operational
monitoring should demonstrate that genuinely valid measurements of water
quality are being recorded in a manner that is consistent with accepted
procedures. However, measurements to demonstrate compliance with a specific
discharge consent should take place in the units and format of the consent. For
example, BOD is a common measurement of pollution load in discharges to
controlled waters, and COD is a common measurement for discharges to sewer.
This situation has not changed since the introduction of the IPPC Directive.
Tim
James from the Environment Agency comments “Monitoring under IPPC follows
similar principles to IPC, except that the Agency has now defined standards for
instrumentation in the new ‘MCERTS’ scheme”
MCERTS has already been established for air quality and
ensures that any techniques used for monitoring are tested and approved by the
relevant authorities before being accepted for compliance monitoring. The
MCERTS scheme for water quality is still in its infancy, but will become the
source of reference for all those involved with compliance monitoring. John
Tipping, from the Agency, comments that the emphasis in the future will move
toward self-monitoring, and that further information on MCERTS is available
from www.mcerts.net .
Frank Holton of Aylesford Newsprint explains how Lange’s
UVAS® probe monitors the organic loading in the primary treated effluent and in
the final discharge to river.
These probes provide ‘operational monitoring’ ensuring that
environmental performance is monitored continuously, so that any potential
problems are quickly identified.
For the past 3 years Aylesford has deployed Lange UV probes
to measure organics in primary and final effluent streams. However, they had
previously used traditional TOC monitors that required a high level of maintenance
and often failed. Lange UK was therefore invited to recommend a more reliable
alternative.
The UVAS® monitors were the obvious solution – they are
robust, self-cleaning and require no calibration.
The UVAS® measures UV (254 nm) extinction (i.e. the proportion
of light that is absorbed by dissolved organics in the effluent) in-situ, by
flashing two beams of light across an aperture in the probe housing. The effect
of turbidity is compensated by a reference measurement. The resulting UVAS® reading is known as the SAC (spectral
absorption coefficient)
Numerous studies have proved the correlation between SAC and
COD (chemical oxygen demand) or TOC. Baumann and Krauth obtained correlation
factors of 0.94 and 0.98 for COD and TOC measurements respectively, in the
primary settling tank. Matsché and Stumwöhrer also show that “UV-absorption has an
excellent correlation to COD in wastewater treatment plants”
Comparison
of Totalising Parameters
Parameter
|
Measured variable |
Method
|
Substance Groups Measured |
BOD
Biological oxygen demand
|
Oxygen consumption
|
Microbial oxidation
|
|
COD
Chemical oxygen demand
|
Oxygen consumption
|
Wet chemical oxidation
|
|
|
TOC |
Carbon concentration |
Thermal, wet chemical oxidation
|
|
SAC
Spectral absorption coefficient |
UV absorption at λ = 254 nm |
UV absorption measurement
|
UVAS® probes can be connected to a multifunctional display unit, the Multi Unit Plus, from which the continuously measured and logged value is immediately available. Users are able to request hourly, daily, weekly, or monthly progress reports, which can be shown graphically or downloaded by RS232. Other Lange monitors, such as pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen and sludge can be included to form a complete monitoring system.
SAC measurements are routine at many different types of
treatment plant, and are deployed at several points in the treatment process,
providing valuable control information for example in intake, activated sludge,
and discharge processes.
Aylesford Newsprint believes that “from an operator’s point
of view the UVASÒsystem is simple to operate, reliable, robust and requires
very little maintenance, and consequently fulfils a vital role in the
protection of the River Medway”
Ends
Words 1,263
![]()